In the end, all 211 CCGs were given the green light to take up their statutory responsibilities for planning and commissioning hospital, community, and mental health services on behalf of their local areas. However, there are various degrees of authorisation.
106 CCGs have now been fully authorised. These will be able to fully function as a
commissioner of local healthcare because they have been judged to have an
entirely clean bill of health. This includes
a total of 43 who met all of the 119 authorisation criteria upon first
assessment plus a further 63 who were able to formally discharge their
conditions during the March re-assessment process.
91 CCGs have been authorised with
conditions. This means that they haven’t
yet satisfied NHS England (formerly the NHS Commissioning Board) that they have
met all of the authorisation criteria. On
the one hand, this might perhaps be because the CCG in question hasn’t yet submitted
some of their paperwork. On the other, it could be something like the
CCG hasn’t yet been able to recruit all members of its governing body – the
secondary care doctor being a typical “gap” at this stage. Moving forwards, these CCGs will be given a
level of formal support from NHS England and the Area Teams and will be
reviewed again later in the year.
14 CCGs have been authorised with legal
directions. This means their conditions
are underpinned by legally-mandated intensive support from NHS England or
another CCG.
Adelphi’s recent recruit to the Spectrum
team, Jo Pritchard, was directly involved in the authorisation process
– personally moderating several of the CCG site visits which formed part of the
assessment process. Jo comments that the majority of these 14 CCGs
failed to meet the authorisation criteria because they don’t have a three year
strategy that is supported by a sound financial plan. In
other words, they cannot demonstrate that they can commission the services that
their population requires within the budget that they have been given.
So now that CCGs are officially in charge
of £65 billion of the £95 billion NHS budget, what does this mean for Industry?
For
example, might pharma need to research which CCGs might be best to target or which
are most ripe for partnership working? And should
brands be considering differential targeting strategies in accordance with the
characteristics and/or priorities of the different CCGs?
These are very key and very timely considerations. We know from research that there is a noteworthy
difference in the attitudes and business potential of many of these CCGs.Indeed, in order to succeed in this clinically-led commissioning environment, several of our more forward-thinking pharma clients are already conducting extensive MR to get to grips with the challenges of the new landscape.
For example, exploring how best to segment
CCGs for targeting purposes or testing various hypotheses on the optimum way to
engage effectively with the NHS post the transition.
The list of important MR topics is mounting
with no two Adelphi clients investigating exactly the same angles and no stone
remaining unturned. Some exceedingly
useful insights are emerging.
All recognise that early knowledge of CCGs
and the key players will be vital to inform effective marketing and customer
engagement strategies.
So the question is can your company really afford to
miss the early boat?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.